The 5 Stages of Group Formation




It is unrealistic to expect a team to perform well from the moment it is formed.
Putting together a team is similar to sustaining a relationship. It takes time, tolerance, cooperation, and dedication and members typically go through several stages as they transform from strangers to a cohesive group with shared aims.

Bruce Tuckman, an educational psychologist, introduced a strategy reflecting the
numerous phases groups must go through to evolve as a team based on his observations of group behavior in various circumstances.

The Five stages of group formation, as proposed by Bruce Tuckman, have become a norm in group dynamics:

  • Forming
  • Storming
  • Norming
  • Performing
  • Adjourning

This strategy incorporates the five stages that every team goes through as it grows. By grasping this strategy, one can reduce the uncertainty of group formation and make a bigger impact. Let's take a deeper look at the five stages of group formation.


Forming

Individuals will be unclear about the group's objective, how they fit in, and if they will get along with one another at first when a new team begins. They can be nervous, intrigued, or eager to get started. They believe, however, that they will seek to the team leader for guidance.

During the formation stage, the group leader takes control. As the spotlight switches to the group leader, they must demonstrate great leadership abilities. This stage may take some time as people get to know their new teammates and their different working styles.


Storming

Conflict frequently emerges during the storming phase as a result of team members differing working styles. Some employees may begin to mistrust the team's previously established aims and cease to execute their essential tasks entirely. 

The crew may be agitated and unorganized at this point, with no clear grasp of their roles. The team leader must keep the group focused on their duties, actions, goals, and tangible outcomes. Some project teams believe they can skip this step, but it's best to address and resolve disputes immediately rather than waiting for them to burst.


Norming

After a dispute has been resolved, the Norming stage decides the condition of peace. The participants show greater respect for the team leader and greater trust in one another at this point.

The team leader takes on the role of curator, standing away and allowing the team more freedom of action. The team now negotiates and makes choices amongst itself.

Members within the team are also given minor assignments. The teams peace, however, is unstable, and if tensions arise, the team may revert to storming.


Performing

Relationships are developed at this time, and the structure is apparent and stable. The team is mature, well-organized, and has a strong sense of collaboration and consensus. Of course, problems and dispute exist, but they are handled properly.

The teams primary focus is on problem solving and achieving objectives. At this point, the job of the leader takes a back seat. Their role changes from that of a strong guiding force to that of a kind adviser They keep the team focused on the goals while without interfering excessively.


Adjourning

The majority of the team's objectives have been met at this point, as the team disbands and goes their separate ways. Some team members may find this difficult because they like the groups routine, have formed strong connections. The role as a team leader is to guide the group through these fears and emotions while also preparing for the next group formation and leadership succession.



Written By - Andria Morais

Edited By - Vanshu Verma

Post a Comment

0 Comments