Govt Sends Notice for Unblocking Controversial Twitter Accounts

 


The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology sent twitter a notice of unilateral decision to unblock more than 250 twitter accounts which had been withheld in India following a legal request.

The notice states that Twitter, by unblocking these accounts, is in violation of Section 69 of the Information Technology Act, which has a prison term of up to seven years.


Why Dozens of Twitter Accounts Were Blocked?

A dozen of twitter accounts were blocked on 1st February, including the leading news magazine, at the request of the government on the grounds that users were posting violence-inducing content.

The move by the social media giant came as a result of protests by Indian farmers, which took a violent turn in January last week, killing a demonstrator and wounding hundreds of people, including police officers.

Tens of thousands of farmers have been camping in the suburbs of New Delhi for more than two months, seeking the removal of new agricultural regulations that they argue favors private buyers at the expense of growers. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government rejects this, arguing that the changes open up new opportunities for farmers to market their produce directly to private buyers.

A government official said the Ministry of Home Affairs had asked for the suspension of "close to 250 Twitter accounts" which were claimed to have shared material that appeared to incite violence. "The order was issued against accounts that were using the hashtag #modiplanningfarmersgenocide that started on 30th January,"

"Genocide incitement is a public offence and a great threat to public order," said the official, who asked not to be named because he was not able to deal publicly with the matter.

India's information technology regulations allow the government to continue to censor internet material that is viewed as an opportunity to disturb public order.


Farmer’s Agitation Echoes Globally

International pop star Rihanna shared her tweet with "#FarmersProtest" to say, "Why aren't we talking about this?! Was Rihanna objected to the suspension of internet services or commented on the merits of the three farm rules? It is not clear. But her tweet was perceived as endorsing their demands by members of the farmers' movement.

Her Twitter post was viral and at least two more internet celebrities—climate protester Greta Thunberg and porn actor-turned-model Mia Khalifa wrote tweets about the farmers' rally in the outskirts of Delhi. That the three celebrities will post within 24 hours on a topic that unified all anti-government camps, causing many to wonder whether tweets were part of a "coordinated campaign" by some activist groups.

People dealing with human rights and survival problems do not understand borders, Congress chief and former finance minister P. Chidamabaram said late Wednesday night about tweets by singer Rihanna and environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg.

Earlier in the day, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) described the tweets by Ms Rihanna and Ms Thunberg, both of whom declared their support for the farmers' unrest, as "sensationalist." However, the stance of the former finance minister on Twitter was different from the views of his former party leader Rahul Gandhi, who called the farmers' protests an "internal matter" in the press.

"It's a positive thing that Rihanna and Greta Thunberg will wake up to the MEA (External Ministry). Come on MEA, when will you know that people dealing with human rights and livelihood problems do not understand national boundaries? "Mr Chidambaram asked in a series of tweets.

Many Indian celebrities like Akshay Kumar and Ajay Devgan have backed the Ministry of External Affairs soon after it put out a statement saying that international celebrities tweeting on the farmers' protests in India was 'neither accurate nor responsible'. Some notable Indian cricketers including Virat Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar tweeted on farmers protest. 

Sachin Tendulkar tweeted that “India’s sovereignty cannot be compromised. External forces can be spectators but not participants. Indians know India and should decide for India. Let's remain united as a nation. All celebrities used hashtags #India together and #India against propaganda. "Farmer’s Agitation is a complex and nuanced issue which requires comprehensive discussion. It doesn't require activism on either side." Said the editor of a news channel. 

Another Congress MP and former State for External Affairs minister, Shashi Tharoor, said that the drive by Indian celebrities on the social media site to fight tweets by Mrs Rihanna and Mrs Thunberg would not serve to boost the government's profile.

"It is humiliating for the Government of India to get Indian celebrities to respond to Western celebrities. The harm caused by GoI's obduracy and undemocratic conduct to India's global reputation cannot be remedied by cricketer’s tweets. Drop farm laws & explore options with farmers & get #IndiaTogether," Mr Tharoor tweeted late.


Notice Sent to Twitter on Restored Accounts

Indian government sends notices to Twitter for not complying with its order to remove accounts trying to incite the situation amid Farmer’s protest. This after Twitter unblocked some accounts after briefly suspending them.

The Government sent a notice to Twitter for the restoring a number of suspended accounts that backed farmers' protests and notify them of the repercussions of the failure to comply with the guidelines given under section 69A of the Act. Twitter after blocking hundreds of accounts earlier in the day, it restored the accounts on the night of February 1st.

The 18-page notice sent to twitter by Indian government claimed that "the impracticability or disproportionality of the said measure cannot be decided by Twitter, which is an intermediary bound by the orders of the Central Government."

Laws under 69A of the IT Act are also used in government-mandated Internet take-offs. The rules allow the government to restrict public access to information from a device 'in the interests of the sovereignty and dignity of India, the protection of India, the welfare of the State, ties of friendship with foreign States or public order, or to prevent incitement to commit any recognizable offenses relevant to the above.'

After Twitter initially complied with the request, officials of the corporation and the Ministry met on evening of 1st February 2021 in which the social media site protested that the contents were "free speech" and "newsworthy."

Government sources told The Indian Express on the same evening that they had not revised their order at the Twitter conference. "Yes, Twitter was trying to fight back against the order, but we didn't change it. You can't write that the PM is committing a genocide against farmers and get away with it. The directives should be followed by Twitter. People can't afford to disrespect the prime minister of the land like this," a government source said.


Written by - Anushka Jain

Edited by - Adrija Saha

Post a Comment

0 Comments