The system of social standing is described by the teeth
social Stratification by Sociologists. A society’s categorization of its people
into rankings of socioeconomic tiers based on factors like wealth, income,
race, education, and power is referred by the teeth Social stratification.
Society’s layers are made of people, and society’s resources are distributed
unevenly throughout the layers. The top layer of the social structure of
stratification represents the people who have more resources.
The lower layers of our society represent the other groups of people, with progressively fewer and fewer resources. The people in the United States like to believe everyone has an equal chance at success.
Advising to Aaron's illustration the belief that hard work and talent
determine social rank not prejudicial treatment or societal values. This
emphasis on self-effort perpetuates the belief that people control their own
social standing.
Different societies define stratification with varying factors. Stratification
is an economic system in most societies which is based on wealth, the net value
of money and assets a person has and income and also person’s wages or
investment dividends.
Though there are some other important factors influence social standing are there sorry from the traditional categorization of people based on how rich or poor they are.
For example, wisdom and charisma are valued in some cultures
and people who have them are revered more than those who don’t. The
inequalities of stratification are often reinforced by the cultural beliefs of
Societies.
The social standing of our parents is a key determinant of social standing. The
social position of parents gets passed on to their children. Social standing
becomes a comfort zone, a familiar lifestyle, and an identity.
Society’s occupational structure is the other determinant of social standing.
For example, Teachers often receive relatively low pay though they have high
levels of education.
Teaching is a noble profession, it is believed by many so teachers should do their jobs for love of their profession and the good of their students, not for money. Yet in the business world where profits are valued as a driving force, no successful executive or entrepreneur would embrace that attitude.
Recent Economic Changes and U.S.
Stratification:
Many families and individuals found themselves struggling like never before as the Great Recession rocked the nation's economy in the last few years. This resulted in a period of prolonged and exceptionally high unemployment throughout the nation.
While no one was completely insulated from the recession, perhaps the lower classes felt the impact most profoundly. Many were living paycheck to paycheck or even had been living comfortably before the recession but as soon as recession hit, they became the first to lose their jobs.
They faced more than loss of income as they were unable to find replacement employment. Their ability to afford healthcare was taken away while their home we're foreclosed and their cars were repossessed.
This put many in mental hesitation of whether to put food on the table or fill a needed prescription.
Like the Great Depression, the Great Recession has changed social attitudes. Where once it was important to demonstrate wealth by wearing expensive clothing items like Calvin Klein shirts and Louis Vuitton shoes, now there’s a new, thriftier way of thinking.
Systems of Stratification:
Sociologists distinguish between two sorts of systems of stratification. Closed systems accommodate little change in social position. They are doing not allow people to shift levels and don't permit social relationships between levels.
Open systems, which are supported achievement, allow movement and interaction between layers and classes. Different systems reflect, emphasize, and foster certain cultural values and shape individual beliefs. Stratification systems include class systems and caste systems, also as meritocracy.
The class structure:
Caste systems are closed stratification systems during which people can do little or nothing to vary their social standing. A class structure is one during which people are born into their social standing and can remain in it their whole lives.
People are assigned occupations no matter their talents, interests, or potential. There are virtually no opportunities to enhance a person’s social position.
In the Hindu caste tradition, people were expected to figure within the occupation of their caste and to enter into marriage consistent with their caste. Accepting this social standing was considered an ethical duty. Cultural values reinforced the system.
Caste systems promote beliefs in fate, destiny, and therefore the will of a better power, instead of promoting individual freedom as a worth. An individual who lived during a caste society was socialized to simply accept his or her social standing.
Although the class structure in India has been officially dismantled, its residual presence in Indian society is deeply embedded. In rural areas, aspects of the tradition are more likely to stay, while urban centers show less evidence of this past.
In India’s larger cities, people now have more opportunities to settle on their own career paths and marriage partners. As a worldwide center of employment, corporations have introduced merit-based hiring and employment to the state.
The Class System:
A class system is predicated on both social factors and individual achievement. A category consists of a group of individuals who share similar status with reference to factors like wealth, income, education, and occupation.
Unlike caste systems, class systems are open. People are liberal to gain a special level of education or employment than their parents. They will also socialize with and marry members of other classes, which allow people to maneuver from one class to a different.
In a class system, occupation isn't fixed at birth. Though family and other societal models help guide an individual toward a career, personal choice plays a task. In class systems, people have the choice to make exogamous marriages, unions of spouses from different social categories.
Marriage in these circumstances is predicated on values like love and compatibility instead of on social standing or economics.
Though social conformities still exist that encourage people to settle on partners within their own class, people aren't as pressured to settle on marriage partners based solely on those elements. Marriage to a partner from an equivalent social background is an endogamous union.
Meritocracy:
Meritocracy is a perfect system supported the assumption that stratification is that the results of personal effort—or merit—that determines social standing.
High levels of effort will cause a high social position, and the other way around. The concept of meritocracy is an ideal—because a society has never existed where social station was based purely on merit.
Because of the complex structure of societies, processes like socialization, and therefore the realities of economic systems, social standing is influenced by multiple factors—not merit alone. Inheritance and pressure to evolve to norms, as an example, disrupt the notion of a pure meritocracy.
While a meritocracy has never existed, sociologists see aspects of meritocracies in modern societies once they study the role of educational and job performance and therefore the systems in situ for evaluating and rewarding achievement in these areas.
Status Consistency:
Social stratification systems determine social position supported factors like income, education, and occupation. Sociologists use the term status consistency to elucidate the consistency, or lack thereof, of an individual’s rank across these factors.
Caste systems correlate with status consistency, whereas the more flexible class system has inferiority consistency.
To illustrate, let’s consider Susan. Susan earned her high school degree but didn't attend college. That factor may be a trait of the lower-middle class. She began doing landscaping work, which, as manual labor, is additionally a trait of lower-middle class or maybe class.
However, over time, Susan started her own company. She hired employees. She won larger contracts.
She became a business owner and earned tons of cash. Those traits represent the upper-middle class. There are inconsistencies between Susan’s educational level, her occupation, and her income.
In a class system, an individual can exerting and have little education and still be in middle or upper class, whereas during a class structure that might not be possible. In a class system, status consistency correlates with having more choices and opportunities.
Summary:
Stratification systems are either closed, meaning they permit little change in social position, or open, meaning they permit movement and interaction between the layers. A class structure is one during which social standing is predicated on ascribed status or birth.
Class systems are open, with achievement playing a task in
social position. People fall under classes supported factors like wealth,
income, education, and occupation. A meritocracy may be a system of
stratification that confers standing supported personal worth, rewarding
effort.
Written by: Gourav Chowdhury
.jpeg)
0 Comments